Monday, February 28, 2005

The NYT's Greatest Discovery: "Winston Churchill, Neocon?"

Thank you New York Times for becoming another conspiracy theorist of neoconservative principles. As if neoconservatism can be easily defined anyway, you have once again proven your stupidity by practicing the age-old screwup of manipulating history with modern terms. I guess this sudden relevation changes everything now, huh? Sure some notable neoconservative authors have claimed that Churchill was an influence in the development of the neocon persuasion; however, the portrayal of President Bush as an idol-worshipping fool to a bronze bust is ludicrous. Too add to the hilarity of this article, the above picture was also included. A good laugh for all at the NYT.


Post a Comment

<< Home